Architecture 2.0
China and India took centre stage during the third edition of architecture symposium Architecture 2.0 on November 11, organised by the Netherlands Architecture Institute (NAI) at De Doelen Rotterdam. Both countries have a fast-growing economy and a rapidly evolving architectural tradition. The mammoth tasks that await these countries will also contribute to shaping the future of architecture. Representatives of different generations of architects from China and India elaborated on developments in their respective homelands at this symposium.

Christopher Benninger and Bimal Patel spoke about India, while Zhang Ke and Yung Ho Chang talked about China. From the Dutch perspective, two speakers shared their experiences of working in these two countries: Jacob van Rijs talked about MVRDV’s projects in India, and David Gianotten about OMA’s work in China.
With the Dutch construction industry currently experiencing a period of stagnation, Dutch architecture firms are increasingly focusing on China, and though their work in India is still marginal, a growing number of Dutch architects are trying to establish a foothold there. Both countries were designated as ‘focus’ countries by various Dutch ministries a few years ago. Many differences exist, but there is a torrent of impressive data from both countries about the rise of new towns and negative side effects, such as poor housing conditions, migration and the growing chasm between rich and poor.
The Netherlands and countries around the world have entered into innumerable cultural collaborations, particularly with China. For years we have focused on imparting knowledge, establishing networks, constructing buildings and introducing products. Reporters, however, remain fascinated by the scale, speed and market growth. It seems we are barely able to articulate the added value of the experience gained and the interchange. China is everywhere nowadays, but a cultural impact or interaction is lacking almost completely. Is our focus on China really driven by opportunism alone? How have Chinese and Indian architects perceived the explosive growth of their cities in recent decades and how did they find a role as an architect amidst this? What is the role of architecture in these two countries? Why do Dutch design firms want to work there? And are they also successful?
The leading scientist Robbert Dijkgraaf made a special contribution. Architecture 2.0 was opened by Alexandra van Huffelen, alderwoman for the City of Rotterdam.
Where and when: Friday, 11 November 2011
Time: 09:30 (auditorium opens at 09:00)
Venue: de Doelen, Willem Burger zaal (Kruisplein 40, Rotterdam)









